Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
675deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1.0-35B-GGUF
text-generation · 623 likes · 233701 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
675text-generation · 623 likes · 233701 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
154150 likes · 0 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
331text-generation · 283 likes · 7629 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
145tabular-classification · 89 likes · 3 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
407text-generation · 376 likes · 191409 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
120image-text-to-text · 107 likes · 12635 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
144text-generation · 120 likes · 901 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
1,678image-text-to-text · 1600 likes · 630246 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
113token-classification · 96 likes · 414 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
3,322text-generation · 3192 likes · 159967 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
1,348image-text-to-text · 1184 likes · 1113871 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
522text-generation · 499 likes · 34371 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
140text-generation · 127 likes · 13038 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
149image-to-video · 138 likes · 0 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
197text-generation · 183 likes · 21935 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
986text-generation · 929 likes · 288741 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
49image-to-image · 49 likes · 0 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
114102 likes · 0 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
4646 likes · 20 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
656text-generation · 623 likes · 114499 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
200text-generation · 191 likes · 5792 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
136text-generation · 130 likes · 196441 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
361text-generation · 336 likes · 46677 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
212text-generation · 200 likes · 136933 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
226text-generation · 181 likes · 2671 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
319text-generation · 296 likes · 135452 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
49text-generation · 49 likes · 16824 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
199text-generation · 154 likes · 511 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
58text-generation · 53 likes · 33018 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
478text-to-image · 441 likes · 56953 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
139text-generation · 138 likes · 1766 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
56text-generation · 56 likes · 37885 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
63text-generation · 63 likes · 38140 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
499text-generation · 490 likes · 212201 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
2,584text-generation · 2556 likes · 597090 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
277text-to-image · 264 likes · 39515 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
241225 likes · 10 downloads
Hugging FaceLLM & Other Models
760text-generation · 760 likes · 72715 downloads
Hugging FaceResearch Papers
Conventional reinforcement learning strategies for visual generation typically employ sample-wise reward functions, yet this practice frequently results in reward hacking that degrades image diversity and introduces visual anomalies. To address these limitations, we present a novel framework that finetunes generative models using distribution-wise rewards, ensuring better alignment with real-world data distributions. Unlike rewards that evaluate samples individually, distribution-wise reward accounts for the data distribution of the samples, mitigating the mode collapse problem that occurs when all samples optimize towards the same direction independently. To overcome the prohibitive computational cost of estimating these rewards, we introduce a subset-replace strategy that efficiently provides reward signals by updating only a small subset of a generated reference set. Additionally, we apply RL to optimize post-hoc model merging coefficients, potentially mitigating the train-inference inconsistency caused by introducing stochastic differential equation (SDE) in regular RL practices. Extensive experiments show our approach significantly improves FID-50K across various base models, from 8.30 to 5.77 for SiT and from 3.74 to 3.52 for EDM2. Qualitative evaluation also confirms that our method enhances perceptual quality while preserving sample diversity.
Hugging FaceResearch Papers
Representation alignment has become an effective way to accelerate diffusion transformer training and improve generation quality. Recent self-alignment methods, such as SRA and Self-Flow, further remove the dependency on external pretrained encoders by constructing alignment within the diffusion model itself. However, the mechanism behind the improvement from SRA to Self-Flow, dual-time scheduling, remains under-examined: Self-Flow attributes its gain to interactions between tokens at different noise levels, where cleaner tokens help infer noisier ones. In this work, we revisit this explanation and ask whether the gain instead comes from data augmentation along the noise dimension. To disentangle these factors, we introduce Attention Separation, which preserves the same dual-timestep input as Self-Flow while blocking attention between tokens assigned to different noise levels. Surprisingly, removing such interaction does not degrade performance and can even improve it, suggesting that the improvement from SRA to Self-Flow mainly comes from data augmentation. Furthermore,We show that Attention Separation itself provides an augmentation effect by splitting a single image into multiple effective training parts to expand the training data. Based on these observations, we combine self-representation alignment with dual-timestep and attention-separation augmentation, and demonstrate the effectiveness of this design on ImageNet.